Who Is Actually a Good Candidate for Microblading or Nano Brows?
Updated: Oct 24
If you scroll through Instagram profiles of some microblading or nano brow artists, you might get the impression that almost everyone is a good candidate for hairstrokes.
Fresh, fluffy hairstrokes appear on almost every client.
But there’s one very important question that doesn’t get asked enough:
How many people are actually ideal candidates for hairstroke procedures?
Do as many people actually qualify for microblading or nano brows as social media make it seem? Do hairstrokes really heal well on most people?
Because being able to tattoo hairstrokes into someone’s skin does not automatically mean hairstrokes were the best technique for that client.
The Ideal Candidate for Microblading or Nano Brows
In my professional experience, the truly ideal candidate for a hairstroke procedure is much more specific than social media might lead you to believe.
The best candidates generally have:
Virgin skin
Normal to dry skin
Poreless skin in the brow area
Healthy skin without significant texture
Soft, even flow of eyebrow hair; no obvious patchiness.
Enough natural hair for tattooed strokes to blend into
Not too densely coarse eyebrow hair
No extreme brow asymmetry requiring substantial reshaping
Realistic expectations about how subtle hairstrokes can heal
A lifestyle and skin type that are favorable for retention
Age, skin condition, oil production, pores, previous tattooing, scar tissue, natural hair density, lifestyle, brow asymmetry and even the client’s desired finished look can all affect whether hairstrokes are actually the smartest choice.
That doesn’t mean everyone outside of the “perfect candidate” category is guaranteed to have terrible results.
It means the outcome becomes less predictable.
And when we’re talking about tattooing someone’s face, predictability matters.
What Can Happen When Hairstrokes Aren’t the Right Choice?
If you research enough, you’ll probably see some of these common complaints:
“My brows disappeared after two weeks.”
“My nano brows disappeared even after my touch-up.”
“My strokes blurred together.”
“My brows turned gray.”
“My strokes don’t look like hairs anymore.”
“My brows healed like a shadow instead of individual strokes.”
And sometimes you’ll hear something even more confusing:
“But I went to a very experienced, reputable artist.”
That’s because choosing a talented artist is only one part of the equation.
The technique also has to make sense for the skin, the natural brows and the client’s expectations.
Beautiful fresh nano brows do not guarantee beautiful healed hairstrokes.
When There Is Doubt, Why Take the Risk?
Permanent makeup isn’t regular makeup.
If you don’t like your eyebrow pencil today, you wash it off tonight.
If you don’t like how your tattooed brows age, fixing them may involve color correction, additional tattooing, saline removal, laser removal—or a combination of treatments over an extended period of time.
Complete removal isn’t always simple or guaranteed either.
That’s why I believe PMU artists should be picky when determining who receives hairstrokes. Not just perform it on almost every client that sits on their chair.
What About Combo Brows?
Combo brows combine hairstrokes with machine shading.
For the right client, they’re a beautiful middle ground.
But because hairstrokes are still part of the procedure, the same healing concerns still apply.
The hairstrokes still have to make sense for that particular client.
And Then There Are Powder Brows
This is where people sometimes misunderstand powder brows.
They hear the word powder and imagine a dark, solid, old-school tattoo. Or a very bold makeup look.
While that could be the results many artists produce with powder brows, that’s not what a properly executed soft powder brow has to look like.
A skilled artist can create extremely soft, airy, pixelated shading with a lighter front and soft body.
And unlike hairstroke techniques, machine shading can be adapted to a much broader range of clients.
Dry skin? Powder brows can work.
Oily skin? Powder brows can work.
Mature skin? Powder brows can work.
Sparse brows? Powder brows can work.
Dense brows that simply need better shape and definition? Powder brows can work.
Clients who normally fill in their eyebrows anyway? Powder brows can make a lot of sense.
Previous PMU may complicate any new procedure and sometimes requires removal first, but when tattooing over appropriate existing work is possible, machine shading also gives the artist options that individual hairstrokes often don’t.
That’s one reason powder brows are such an important technique for PMU artists to master.
Then why are some artists’ Instagram profiles mainly consist of microblading and nano brows?
Now we get to the interesting part.
If hairstrokes require more careful candidate selection while powder brows can accommodate a much wider range of clients, why do some artists’ portfolios appear to consist almost entirely of some form of Microblading, nano brow or combo brow strokes?
There are several reasons.
But the main one is impossible to ignore:
Fresh hairstrokes photograph beautifully.
They create beautiful before-and-after transformations.
A client comes in with sparse eyebrows and leaves with dozens of perfectly defined little lines that resemble eyebrow hairs.
It’s visually impressive.
It’s extremely marketable.
It attracts a lot of people.
It brings business.
Clients love the idea of getting something advertised as looking just like “real hair.”
But the most marketable technique isn’t automatically the most predictable technique for every person.
Think About How the Techniques Are Usually Described
Imagine you’re trying to get your brows done with permanent makeup and an artist gives you these two descriptions:
Nano brows:
Creates fine, hair-like strokes designed to resemble your natural eyebrow hairs for a fuller but natural appearance.
Powder brows:
Creates a makeup-like shaded effect throughout the eyebrows.
Which one sounds safer to someone terrified of tattooed-looking eyebrows?
Probably the first one.
You might immediately think:
I definitely want nano brows. I don’t want my eyebrows looking like makeup all the time.
But there’s information missing from that decision.
What will those hairstrokes look like healed?
What will they look like after they have been touched up?
Will they remain individually visible?
How much will they blur?
Could they eventually fuse together?
Will they actually give you enough definition that you can stop filling in your eyebrows?
And what does a well executed soft powder brow result actually look like once healed? Can it actually heal soft, airy, and borderless? How does it compare to a healed nano brow?
Because if you actually compare healed results, you’d be surprised to find out that a well done soft healed powder brow may look significantly more natural than you’re imagining.
Sometimes Clients Don’t Know What They’re Actually Choosing
A client shouldn’t be expected to understand skin biology, pigment behavior, implantation techniques and long-term PMU aging.
That’s what they’re paying the professional for.
So while I absolutely believe clients should have input into their desired result, I don’t believe the entire technique decision should come down to:
“Which one do you want?”
The artist should explain which technique is the most appropriate for that particular client and why.
Sometimes that means telling someone:
“I know you came in asking for nano brows, but based on your skin, natural brows and the result you’re hoping to achieve, I believe powder brows would give you a more predictable outcome.”
That’s not losing a nano client.
That’s doing your job.
There’s Another Problem: Powder Brows Require Skill Too
Not every powder brow is soft.
Poorly executed powder brows can absolutely become overly saturated, blocky or harsh.
Creating beautiful powder brows requires good machine control, proper pixelation, saturation control, color selection and an understanding of gradients.
So an artist who is significantly better at hairstrokes than shading may genuinely believe that hairstrokes are the prettier option because her own powder brow results aren’t as natural.
And then when the strokes do not heal well, the answer they give you is:
“Well, your skin just didn’t retain it.”
Sometimes skin genuinely does behave unpredictably.
But a good artist should identify predictable risk factors before the tattoo is performed whenever possible.
One of the Biggest Red Flags To Look for in a Portfolio
If an artist’s page consists almost entirely of some form of hairstrokes. 🚩🚩 That’s the biggest red flag.
Don’t let yourself be fooled by marketing language, by beautiful fresh pictures or by impressive credentials.
Ask yourself:
Where are the healed results?
And most importantly:
Does the healed portfolio support what the fresh portfolio is promising?
You want evidence that technique selection is being based on what will heal best on the client—not simply on which fresh result creates the prettiest Instagram post.
This is the part I want prospective clients to investigate for themselves.
Don’t base your conclusion on what any PMU artist says. Don't even base it on what I'm saying here.
Go look at healed portfolios yourself!
“But I’ve Seen Nano Brows Heal Beautifully.”
Absolutely.
Beautiful healed hairstrokes exist.
That’s not the argument.
The question is:
How consistently can that healed result be reproduced across the artist’s entire clientele?
If an artist's healed portfolio only consists of a couple healed cases, those could just be the lucky cases as far as we know.
An artist can perform hundreds of procedures and selectively show you the clients whose skin retained beautiful, separated strokes.
That doesn’t tell you what normally happens.
“But some nano brow artists do have a huge collection of healed nano brow results”
Yes, there are many artists out there who appear to have a huge collection of healed nano brow results. But look very closely at the healed evidence and ask yourself:
How many healed brows are shown on video?
How many of those videos show both brows?
How many of those videos that show both brows, zoom in to show the brows from up close and zoom out to show the whole face as well?
How many of those healed cases are actually healed brows and not fresh touch ups? Fresh touch ups are still a fresh procedure, not a healed result.
Now when you actually start looking for that kind of evidence, all of a sudden their extensive large healed portfolio suddenly begins shrinking quite considerably.
That’s because most artists that focus heavily on hairstrokes just show one brow, one angle when showing healed results.
There’s a lot that can go wrong with your brows if you’re basing your decision based on beautiful healed photos that only show one brow. You want to see video evidence. You want to see both brows. Not just from up close but also full face footage.
The lack of enough of those kind of healed results is the evidence telling you that strokes are not suitable for most people.
“But powder brow artists also don’t have large healed portfolios either”
Yes, most artists in general don’t really have large healed portfolios.
But if you were to rank techniques by what artists post the most healed results on, you’ll notice that powder brows is the technique that usually gets posted more. You’ll even notice that some hairstroke healed results even look like shading.
So if most hairstrokes end up blurring and fusing together creating a shadow look, who would you rather create that shadow? A hairstroke profesional or a soft powder brow specialist?
Before you answer, compare the shadow healed results from a nano brow to the healed shadow of a soft powder brow and decide which shadow looks the best.
That comparison is far more valuable than arguing over which technique looks more natural when its freshly done.
But What About All Those 5-Star Reviews Microblading and Nano Brow Artists Tend to Have?
Reviews matter.
But reviews and healed portfolios answer two different questions.
A five-star review may tell you that the client loves her new brows even after they’ve healed.
That’s valuable information.
But 5 star reviews don’t necessarily tell you if those people share your standards, preferences or expectations.
And it most importantly doesn’t necessarily tell you if you’d love those same healed results on your brows.
Only an extensive healed portfolio can tell you that. Reviews are just supporting evidence.
If you’re currently researching artists, I wrote a detailed guide explaining exactly what to look for when analyzing healed permanent makeup portfolios, including some of the red flags prospective clients commonly miss.
Read next:
Comments